strategysignals.duckdns.org publishes 7 machine-payable endpoints over the x402 protocol, priced from $0.01 to $0.4 per call. Each was probed directly; the response code below is what it returned.
| Endpoint | Method | Price | Probe |
|---|---|---|---|
| /tools/strategy-backtest | POST | $0.25 | 200 |
| /tools/strategy-backtest/compare | POST | $0.35 | 200 |
| /tools/strategy-composite | POST | $0.04 | 402 |
| /tools/strategy-consensus | POST | $0.015 | 200 |
| /tools/strategy-consensus/batch | POST | $0.03 | 402 |
| /tools/strategy-profiles | POST | $0.4 | 200 |
| /tools/strategy-rank | POST | $0.01 | 200 |
What would $1,000 have become if you'd followed this rule historically? On-demand parameterized backtest of the 200-day-SMA + trailing-stop methodology against real historical data -- caller supplies …
Does a 150-day or 200-day SMA actually perform better on this asset? Test two parameter sets head-to-head against the same asset and date range in one call, with both real results and a declared winne…
The flagship signal: a single transparent 0-100 conviction score combining trend regime, volatility context, and relative strength vs other tracked assets -- with the full component breakdown shown, n…
Live trend regime + volatility context for one asset (BTC/ETH/SOL/XRP/ADA), backed by a backtested 200-day-SMA + trailing-stop methodology. Optionally personalized to your own entry price/date.
Same as strategy-consensus, for 2-3 assets in one call -- cheaper than calling the single-asset endpoint that many times separately.
Three honestly-backtested risk profiles (conservative/balanced/aggressive) of the same validated trend + trailing-stop methodology, each with real historical numbers -- pick based on your own risk tol…
Which of BTC/ETH/SOL is relatively strongest right now, ranked by distance above/below each asset's own 200-day SMA -- one answer for rotation strategies instead of comparing raw per-asset data yourse…