Directory / strategysignals.duckdns.org
Three honestly-backtested risk profiles (conservative/balanced/aggressive) of the same validated trend + trailing-stop methodology, each with real historical numbers -- pick based on your own risk tolerance instead of guessing which parameters suit you.
# 1. Ask the endpoint what it costs (no payment, no wallet needed): curl -i -X POST 'https://strategysignals.duckdns.org/tools/strategy-profiles' # -> HTTP/1.1 402 Payment Required # the response carries the price, asset and pay-to address. # 2. Pay and retry with any x402 client: npx x402-fetch -X POST 'https://strategysignals.duckdns.org/tools/strategy-profiles'
Endpoint: https://strategysignals.duckdns.org/tools/strategy-profiles. Operated by strategysignals.duckdns.org, not by Animica. Price and availability were correct at the last probe on 2026-08-26 and are set by the operator, who may change them.
What would $1,000 have become if you'd followed this rule historically? On-demand parameterized backtest of the 200-day-SMA + trailing-stop methodology against …
Does a 150-day or 200-day SMA actually perform better on this asset? Test two parameter sets head-to-head against the same asset and date range in one call, wit…
The flagship signal: a single transparent 0-100 conviction score combining trend regime, volatility context, and relative strength vs other tracked assets -- wi…
Live trend regime + volatility context for one asset (BTC/ETH/SOL/XRP/ADA), backed by a backtested 200-day-SMA + trailing-stop methodology. Optionally personali…
Same as strategy-consensus, for 2-3 assets in one call -- cheaper than calling the single-asset endpoint that many times separately.
Which of BTC/ETH/SOL is relatively strongest right now, ranked by distance above/below each asset's own 200-day SMA -- one answer for rotation strategies instea…